Hydra V3.0
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
Hydra V3.0
First of all, greetings to everyone, and thanks for having this page up
Here's an AGV I've built a while ago. It's on my site, which's still under construction
Here's the link to the actual page:
HYDRA V3.0
and here's a picture:
The project is open source. PCB files, and the PIC C code are available on the same page.
I'm not writing much here since the page has all the details...
Also look up Technoshamanarchist on Youtube for videos of Hydra and other projects.
Happy programming / building
Here's an AGV I've built a while ago. It's on my site, which's still under construction
Here's the link to the actual page:
HYDRA V3.0
and here's a picture:
The project is open source. PCB files, and the PIC C code are available on the same page.
I'm not writing much here since the page has all the details...
Also look up Technoshamanarchist on Youtube for videos of Hydra and other projects.
Happy programming / building
Re: Hydra V3.0
Thank you Conrad
Yes, there's a wireless camera on it (but that's the front, the black box at the back is a 12V 0.8Ah lead/acid battery) which I can view on my PC which has the receiver connected to a TV card on it. By the way, the hosting server is under maintenance, so the picture and the site is unavailable for a while
Yes, there's a wireless camera on it (but that's the front, the black box at the back is a 12V 0.8Ah lead/acid battery) which I can view on my PC which has the receiver connected to a TV card on it. By the way, the hosting server is under maintenance, so the picture and the site is unavailable for a while
Re: Hydra V3.0
Alright technoshaman,
amazing
have you thought of upgrading the tracks to others?
how about trying out ATMEGA MCU?
Thansk
Conrad
amazing
have you thought of upgrading the tracks to others?
how about trying out ATMEGA MCU?
Thansk
Conrad
Re: Hydra V3.0
Well, Hydra is complete really. I sometimes get caught in the process and won't stop adding more and more to the same project, which is actually bad, because I should move on to another one so I can get more creative so, I'd rather make a more advanced robot with better tracks, rather than upgrading this one.
I've been using PIC MCU's for about 4 years now (I'm used to designing with them in mind), and I don't really know why I should go for Atmega's (why should I, unless they have some huge advantage over the PIC's?). Maybe you can help and enlighten me
Thanks
I've been using PIC MCU's for about 4 years now (I'm used to designing with them in mind), and I don't really know why I should go for Atmega's (why should I, unless they have some huge advantage over the PIC's?). Maybe you can help and enlighten me
Thanks
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|